Where does our moral authority come from??

One of the questions that Christians often ask we atheists is where does our moral authority come from? The Christian of course claims that the bible is the basis for moral authority. God has set down moral standards by which all judgments and laws can be determined. Now whether or not that is accurate (and I think it's not) this is the simplistic view of many Christians.

It does sound like a reasonable argument. However it fails to recognise how we actually make moral decisions. Firstly the bible does not mention every possible moral dilemma. There is no mention of stem cell research in the bible, so the believer must find a passage that they think applies. Then they extend that principle to the new situation. Not all Christians agree so discussion occurs until some general consensus is reached. So it is not the bible that decides it is the believer.

We non-believers decide what is moral based on reason and practice. We decide that murder is wrong because we don't like the idea of being murdered. Our definition includes all sorts of acts. Over time situations arise that may make us refine what we consider murder. If it is just taking human life then maybe we would want to add intention because otherwise accidental deaths would be murder. As society we refine and change our view of what is moral based on reason and experience.

This sounds a lot like our modern legal process, because it is in this fashion we decide what is moral. Does it change? Yes of course it has to. In the same way that Christians change their morality. Christians change, yes is slavery still O.K, it was a hundred and fifty years ago?

In short we all raw our moral judgments from a combination of reason and experience. These choices are made before any religious view comes into it. Even devout believers often change their mind when the moral precepts prevent them doing what they want.

Atheists then have the same moral authority as believers reason and experience and that is as good as it gets.

You will Know the Truth and the truth will set you free.

As a Christian I always felt that I was a believer in the truth. I always loved the line that as Christians we knew that the WORD needed no defence, it only needed to be set free. It was a lion that devoured its opponents. I think that no longer, as time after time devout bible believing Christians do their best to surprise, rewrite and downright lie in order to prevent any other view being heard.

This latest article as linked above is a classic example of the outrageous behavior of fundamentalist Christians in trying to suppress evidence of evolution. At one of the foremost museums in the world they want to suppress a display of mankinds ancestors because "Our doctrine is not that we evolved from apes, and we have grave concerns that the museum wants to enhance the prominence of something presented as fact which is just one theory."

They wish to surpress a

.. collection includes the most complete skeleton yet found of Homo erectus, the 1.7 million-year-old Turkana Boy unearthed by Dr Leakey's team in 1984 at Nariokotome, near Lake Turkana in northern Kenya.

The museum also holds bones from several specimens of Australopithecus anamensis, believed to be the first hominid to walk upright, four million years ago. Together the artifacts amount to the clearest record yet discovered of the origins of Homo sapiens.

In short the church does not believe they have the truth, they do not believe their bible can stand up for itself, they do not have faith that God will support their view. So instead they attempt to interfere with a museum exhibit. I have been thinking lately maybe non-believers should start to go into church and complain that they tell only one story, that other Gods deserve to be represented and insist that the Koran and Bible both be included.

The museum is a place for science let's leave religion in the church where it belongs and let people make up their own minds.